Healthy Debate
  • Search
  • Health topics
  • Debates
  • Special Series
  • All topics
  • All articles
Most popular today
  • COVID-19 (567)
  • Vaccines (140)
  • Opioids (53)
  • Cancer (163)
  • Addiction (175)
  • Racism (39)
  • Alcohol (23)
  • Infectious Disease (685)
  • Marijuana (23)
  • Tobacco (22)
  • Aging (213)
  • Dementia (46)
  • Long-Term Care (84)
  • Children and Youth (277)
  • Education (386)
  • Medical Education (193)
  • Depression (26)
  • Misinformation (110)
  • Nursing (29)
  • End of Life (183)
  • In Memoriam (5)
  • MAiD (33)
  • Environment (70)
  • Climate Change (35)
  • About
  • Subscribe
Article
Jun 3, 2013
by Lisa Priest

A patient asks: does my ancestry put me at higher risk of breast cancer?

0 Comments
Share on:

The Personal Health Navigator is available to all Canadian patients. Questions about your doctor, hospital or how to navigate the health care system can be sent to AskLisa@Sunnybrook.ca

The Question: I had my mammogram done last year. I also registered for a breast-screening program at a hospital. My aunt, who is my mama’s sister, died from breast cancer. Considering that I am of Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry, I think I am at some risk. I was told at the reception area of the mammogram department that I will be having my mammogram every two years. I think it should be every year. What do you think?

The Answer: No professional organization in Canada or the United States recommends testing for the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genetic mutations based solely on ancestry. However, Jewish women are believed to be more likely to test positive for one of those two genetic mutations, compared to women tested at random. Consequently, testing is often recommended for Jewish women with family histories of cancer.

This is true only for Jewish women who identify themselves as being Ashkenazi – a group with mainly Central and Eastern European ancestry. BRCA mutation is not considered more common in those with Sephardic Jewish ancestry (those of Middle Eastern and North African descent), according to Ellen Warner, a medical oncologist at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre.

The issue of genetic testing – and of taking proactive measures when the results are known – came to the forefront recently when actress and director Angelina Jolie wrote an op-ed piece called “My Medical Choice” in The New York Times.

After learning she carried the BRCA1 mutation, she opted to get a prophylactic double mastectomy. (Her mother died at age 56, after being diagnosed with cancer almost a decade earlier.)

“I wanted to write this to tell other women that the decision to have a mastectomy was not easy. But it is one I am very happy that I made,” Ms. Jolie wrote in the New York Times. “My chances of developing breast cancer have dropped from 87 per cent to under 5 per cent. I can tell my children that they don’t need to fear they will lose me to breast cancer.”

In your case, since you have not had a formal risk assessment, there is no medical rationale to warrant ordering more medical surveillance. The best way to start is to have a formal risk assessment in a familial cancer/high-risk clinic. You may have other personal risk factors that are important.

It would also be helpful to determine whether you have other relatives (on either side of your family) who had cancer. If anyone else on your mother’s side of the family had breast or ovarian cancer then genetic testing would start with that person. Otherwise, your mother and any other siblings and children of your aunt should be tested.

If your mother has a BRCA gene and you don’t, that is considered a “true negative” and your risk from your aunt’s cancer disappears, according to Dr. Warner. Alternatively, if your mother (and any other of her relatives who are tested) tests negative, your father has no family history of breast cancer and you have no other significant risk factors, then your risk in only slightly increased by your aunt’s cancer and breast screening every 2 years is perfectly appropriate, Dr. Warner said.

If you carry the genetic mutation, each of your children has a 50 per cent chance of carrying it. Having tested positive for such a mutation may also have other unintended consequences, such as the ability and cost to take out life insurance.

“If she has the mutation, we know how to deal with that,” said Dr. Warner, noting that women who carry either of the breast cancer genetic mutations, will undergo a special type of screening that includes mammography but also magnetic resonance imaging, which is far more sensitive at finding tumors.

You could also be offered a drug such as tamoxifen to lower your risk of breast cancer. You may opt instead for prophylactic mastectomy. It would also be recommended that you remove your ovaries and fallopian tubes because of the high risk of tubal or ovarian cancer with these mutations.

If you have a BRCA1 or BRCA1 genetic mutation, you will be at a high lifetime cancer risk. Specifically, you will have about a 70 per cent risk of having breast cancer and up to a 40 per cent chance of ovarian cancer in your lifetime unless you do something to reduce your risk, like Ms. Jolie did to reduce her risk of breast cancer.

“Knowledge is power,” said Dr. Warner, noting that women, now more than ever, have the ability to control their health.

If you are concerned, I would encourage you to have a discussion with your family physician about obtaining a referral for a full assessment.

Lisa Priest is Sunnybrook’s Manager of Community Engagement & Patient Navigation. Her blog Personal Health Navigator provides advice and answers questions from patients and their families, relying heavily on medical and health experts.  Her blog is reprinted on healthydebate.ca with the kind permission of Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre.  Send questions to AskLisa@sunnybrook.ca.

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Logo

Share on:
Author

Lisa Priest

Contributor

Lisa Priest is Sunnybrook’s Manager of Community Engagement & Patient Navigation. Her blog Personal Health Navigator provides advice and answers questions from patients and their families, relying heavily on medical and health experts.  Her blog is reprinted on healthydebate.ca with the kind permission of Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre.  Send questions to AskLisa@sunnybrook.ca.

Republish this article

Republish this article on your website under the creative commons licence.

Learn more

The comments section is closed.

Author

Lisa Priest

Contributor

Lisa Priest is Sunnybrook’s Manager of Community Engagement & Patient Navigation. Her blog Personal Health Navigator provides advice and answers questions from patients and their families, relying heavily on medical and health experts.  Her blog is reprinted on healthydebate.ca with the kind permission of Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre.  Send questions to AskLisa@sunnybrook.ca.

Republish this article

Republish this article on your website under the creative commons licence.

Learn more

Donate to Healthy Debate

Your support allows us to publish journalism about healthcare in Canada that is free to read and free to republish. Donations are tax-deductible.

Donate

Join the mailing list

Sign up below to receive our newsletter every Thursday morning.

You can republish our articles online or in print for free. Read more.

Republish us
  • About
  • Contribute
  • Contact
  • Community Guidelines
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Republish this article

  1. Please use the invisible republishing code below on the page where you republish this article.
  2. Please give credit to Healthy Debate and include a link back to our home page or the article URL . Our preference is a credit at the top of the article and that you include our logo  (available by clicking the link below).

Please read the full set of instructions for republication here.