The recent massive search in Western Australia for a highly radioactive ceramic disc that had fallen off a truck drew worldwide attention. Amazingly, the cylindrical capsule, about half the size of a dime across and five stacked dimes long, was found. But could a similar incident happen in Canada?
The disc fell out of a fixed radioactive gauge device somewhere along its more than 1,300-km truck ride from a Rio Tinto mine site in Newman en route to Perth. It is believed that vibrations from the truck ride loosened an outer screw on the device, allowing the capsule to drop out of the screw-hole and onto the road.
The tiny capsule was found by driving slowly along the road and using a gamma-ray detector. Australian government officials described it as trying to find a needle in a haystack.
Standing one metre away from the radioactive capsule for one hour would expose a person to the same amount of radiation as about one year of average natural background radiation in Canada. However, “prolonged close exposure to the capsule – for instance, if someone picked it up and put it in their pocket – could cause severe, and even potentially deadly, health effects within hours,” Angela Di Fulvio, an assistant professor of nuclear engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, told ABC news.
In 1999, a welder at the Yanango hydroelectric plant in Peru experienced the awful health effects that Di Fulvio described. The welder picked up what looked like a metal pellet attached to a braided steel cable. Not realizing what it was, the worker put the object in his right back pocket and continued to work. In fact, it was a highly radioactive industrial radiography source that had come out of its protective housing. Although the radioactive source was in the welder’s pocket for only about 6 1/2 hours, his fate was sealed. Despite six months of hospitalization and intense supportive care, the welder suffered progressive ulceration and infections in his right thigh and eventually had to have his leg amputated.
Canada is a nation rich in natural resources, with associated industrial activities such as mining, fossil fuel extraction and the laying of pipelines. These activities commonly use radioactive gauges, also called sealed-source devices, for quality assurance testing such as measuring water concentration, fluid levels, material density or checking for cracks in metal welds.
“Prolonged close exposure to the capsule could cause severe, and even potentially deadly, health effects within hours.”
Sealed-source devices are also used for sterilizing medical equipment, food irradiation and radiation therapy.
Radioactive gauges can be permanently attached to a structure, or they can be portable. While the size of fixed gauges varies, depending on what they are used for, portable gauges are generally the size of a large lunch box.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) classifies radioactive sources as “extremely dangerous” (class 1) to “most unlikely to be dangerous” (class 5), depending on the radioactive source. The lost Australian radioactive pellet was an IAEA “unlikely to be dangerous” or a class 4 source – unless, of course, you put it in your pocket.
There were more than 70,000 registered sources in Canada in 2020, with about 90 per cent of them being classified as dangerous (class 1, 2 or 3) to humans.
CNSC requires sealed-source device licensees to report lost or stolen devices. Immediate measures are taken to investigate and locate them, especially for higher-risk devices.
From 2008 to 2022, CNSC reported 37 lost and 27 stolen sealed-source devices . Except for one, all contained sources which were unlikely to be dangerous. Only nine devices were recovered, including the one containing a dangerous source. There have been no reports of radiation-exposure injuries related to these incidents.
In portable sealed-source devices, the radioactive source is stored in a gauge device that blocks radiation from escaping. The source comes out only when the device is in use and there are strict operating procedures to protect workers, the public and the environment.
In an email dated March 31, CNSC said: “To this day, there has never been a reported event to the CNSC that involved the loss of a sealed source after it came out of the radiation device.”
However, as is illustrated by what happened in Peru, there have been incidents that demonstrate the disastrous effects of picking up an unsecured radioactive source, which can look like an innocuous metal pellet.
In general, minimizing exposure time and staying at least two metres away from a suspect unshielded source will be protective. In the unlikely event that you recognize a loose radioactive source, stay away, warn others not to approach or handle the source and call the local authorities. The police and local hazmat teams should know how to assess and manage the situation.