Healthy Debate
  • Search
  • Health topics
  • Debates
  • Special Series
  • All topics
  • All articles
Most popular today
  • COVID-19 (570)
  • Vaccines (145)
  • Opioids (55)
  • Cancer (172)
  • Addiction (180)
  • Racism (41)
  • Alcohol (23)
  • Infectious Disease (691)
  • Marijuana (23)
  • Tobacco (24)
  • Aging (219)
  • Dementia (48)
  • Long-Term Care (87)
  • Children and Youth (290)
  • Education (412)
  • Medical Education (209)
  • Depression (29)
  • Misinformation (116)
  • Nursing (32)
  • End of Life (189)
  • In Memoriam (5)
  • MAiD (34)
  • Environment (74)
  • Climate Change (39)
  • About
  • Subscribe
Opinion
Dec 15, 2025
by Rida Ghani

No, women aren’t supposed to hurt: Misconceptions about reproductive health have serious consequences

3 Comments
Share on:

The message is conveyed to millions of young women who grow up in Canada: period pain is normal; pelvic pain is normal; pushing through discomfort is normal. By the time they finally see a doctor, they have spent years minimizing their symptoms, years that come at a cost.

The belief that “women are supposed to hurt” is deeply embedded in Canadian culture and reflects a systems-level failure that determines who gets diagnosed, who gets believed and who gets left behind.

Many teenagers assume that debilitating symptoms are expected. Research shows that 60 per cent of Canadian women experience primary dysmenorrhea and 17 per cent miss school or work because of it. Yet, most never seek care because they have been taught that pain is normal.

This normalization is even more pronounced in racialized, immigrant and low-income communities, where silence around reproductive health is common and where resilience is often equated with suffering.

Pain minimization, however, has real consequences.

A large Canadian survey found that women with endometriosis wait an average of 5.4 years before diagnosis.

A BMC Women’s Health study reports that women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome face an average delay of 4.3 years, often seeing multiple providers before anyone recognizes their symptoms.

These delays mean years of untreated pain, fertility challenges, missed school, disrupted work and growing mental-health strain.

There are several issues causing these delays:

Provider bias: Research shows that women’s pain is more likely to be dismissed or attributed to anxiety.

Poor training in gynecologic pain: Family physicians often receive minimal education on endometriosis and PCOS, despite both being common chronic conditions.

Fragmented care pathways: Young women are bounced between family doctors, walk-in clinics, gynecologists and specialists, with no coordinated system to guide them through their care.

Lack of menstrual health literacy: Many patients can’t distinguish between typical discomfort and symptoms requiring evaluation because they were never taught to do so.

But when women grow up thinking pain is to be expected, and physicians either are not trained or don’t have the time to investigate, delays are inevitable. The result is that a generation of young women live with suffering that could have been averted or treated much sooner.

There are, however, steps we can take.

Teach menstrual and pelvic pain education in schools: Teens should learn what normal menstrual cycles look like and when symptoms require medical attention.

Integrate standardized screening into primary care: Simple questions during annual visits could identify red flags early.

Build multidisciplinary women’s health clinics: Models combining gynecology, endocrinology, mental health, and pain management reduce delays and prevent patients from getting “lost” in the system.

Prioritize trauma-informed and gender-sensitive care: Validating a young woman’s pain, even briefly, increases the likelihood she will return for follow-up treatment.

Launch national public education campaigns: Normalize talking about menstrual health the way we talk about heart health or diabetes.

Pain normalization affects education, employment, fertility, mental health and long-term economic outcomes. It disproportionately harms marginalized women and widens existing health inequities.

If Canada is committed to gender equity and universal health coverage, then we must address the fact that young women’s pain too often goes unheard, not because they are silent, but because the world taught them to be.

Share on:
Related content
Nov 26, 2025
by Miranda Schreiber

‘Things went horribly wrong’: Patient advocates spreading the word about dangers of Botox

Much of the conversation about Botox centres on whether it looks good or bad, or if getting it can be considered a “feminist” choice. Less attention has been given to the fact that research indicates that one in six patients who are injected with Botox experiences adverse effects from the procedure.

Nov 12, 2025
by W. Glen Pyle Sofia B. Ahmed

Canada needs a women’s health strategy: Lives depend on it

The path forward to prioritizing women’s health and well-being must be laid by Canadians whose voices propel political, social and economic change around the world.

Aug 5, 2025
by Shay Freger

Endometriosis is a national health crisis: Why aren’t we treating it like one?

If we want to build a more equitable and responsive health-care system, one that doesn’t leave millions behind, we must start by acknowledging endometriosis as the national health issue that it is.

Authors

Rida Ghani

Contributor

Rida Ghani is a health communications writer and clinical administrative professional based in Calgary, focusing on women’s health equity and patient-centered care.

Republish this article

Republish this article on your website under the creative commons licence.

Learn more

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3 Comments
  • susanne says:
    January 11, 2026 at 11:59 am

    Read Rida’s piece in TheBMJ this week. Wonderful! Thanks from many who have suffered in silence.

    Reply
  • Dr. Christopher Leighton says:
    December 15, 2025 at 1:23 pm

    If this oncologist could chime in: It’s not normal for women in their 50s and 60s to have persistent bloating and intermittent abdominal pain. The bias to discount women in chronic pain is something female physicians have learned too. Gender bias is ingrained, but hopefully more light will help to extinguish it. Women must be strong health advocates for themselves.

    “Ovarian cancer” commonly presents in the late 50s to mid 60s with vague but persistent abdomino-pelvic symptoms. Family physicians must consider ovarian cancer within the differential diagnosis. Treating presumptive gluten sensitivity, lactose intolerance, or IBS for example, without significant improvement is seen often in this patient group. A simple transvaginal ovarian ultrasound may miss the diagnosis. The majority of women with high grade serous carcinomas of the abdomen (the usual “ovarian cancer” pathology) present with stage III-IV disease incl. peritoneal carcinomatosis. These tumours most frequently originate from foci of cancer within the fallopian tubes (often small primaries) which shed malignant cells into the abdominal cavity. So the ovaries may be normal on imaging. CT or MRI imaging is the preferred modality for clinical diagnosis, possibly with tumour marker CA-125 and CA19-9. Free abdominal or pelvic fluid with peritoneal studding in the absence of organ metastasis is strongly suggestive of high grade serous carcinoma. Though ovarian cancer is uncommon, it is the 6th leading cause of cancer death among women

    Reply
    • Rida Ghani says:
      December 25, 2025 at 7:57 pm

      Thank you so much for sharing these insights. You’re absolutely right, persistent abdominal or pelvic symptoms in women, especially in their 50s and 60s, should never be dismissed as “normal” or attributed to benign causes without proper evaluation. Highlighting the nuances of ovarian and fallopian tube cancers, including how they can evade standard imaging like transvaginal ultrasound, is crucial for both patients and clinicians.

      Your points reinforce the need for heightened awareness among healthcare providers and the importance of women advocating for thorough investigations when symptoms persist. Bringing attention to these diagnostic challenges is exactly the kind of conversation that can help reduce bias and improve outcomes.

      Reply
Authors

Rida Ghani

Contributor

Rida Ghani is a health communications writer and clinical administrative professional based in Calgary, focusing on women’s health equity and patient-centered care.

Republish this article

Republish this article on your website under the creative commons licence.

Learn more

Donate to Healthy Debate

Your support allows us to publish journalism about healthcare in Canada that is free to read and free to republish. Donations are tax-deductible.

Donate

Join the mailing list

Sign up below to receive our newsletter every Thursday morning.

You can republish our articles online or in print for free. Read more.

Republish us
  • About
  • Contribute
  • Contact
  • Community Guidelines
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Republish this article

  1. Please use the invisible republishing code below on the page where you republish this article.
  2. Please give credit to Healthy Debate and include a link back to our home page or the article URL . Our preference is a credit at the top of the article and that you include our logo  (available by clicking the link below).

Please read the full set of instructions for republication here.