Healthy Debate
  • Search
  • Health topics
  • Debates
  • Special Series
  • All topics
  • All articles
Most popular today
  • COVID-19 (573)
  • Vaccines (147)
  • Opioids (57)
  • Cancer (179)
  • Addiction (191)
  • Racism (45)
  • Alcohol (26)
  • Infectious Disease (696)
  • Marijuana (24)
  • Tobacco (26)
  • Aging (230)
  • Dementia (53)
  • Long-Term Care (92)
  • Children and Youth (297)
  • Education (426)
  • Medical Education (218)
  • Depression (30)
  • Misinformation (117)
  • Nursing (35)
  • End of Life (196)
  • In Memoriam (5)
  • MAiD (36)
  • Environment (74)
  • Climate Change (39)
  • About
  • Subscribe
Opinion
Aug 6, 2026
by Sylvia Okonofua

Forty years after the Ottawa Charter, why do we still struggle to act on what we know?

0 Comments
Share on:

This year marks the 40th anniversary of the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion, one of the most influential public health documents ever written. Adopted by delegates from 38 countries at the World Health Organization’s First International Conference on Health Promotion, the Charter fundamentally transformed how we think about health by challenging the notion that health is created primarily in hospitals and clinics. Instead, it argued that health is shaped by the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age.

That idea is no longer controversial. Public health professionals, policymakers, researchers and health-care leaders routinely acknowledge the importance of the social determinants of health, and we understand that housing, education, employment, income, food security, social inclusion and access to opportunity profoundly influence health outcomes.

We have understood for decades that building a healthier society requires addressing the social determinants of health. Yet knowledge alone has never been enough. While the evidence has grown, the political commitment to act on it has not always kept pace. Without sustained investment and coordinated action across sectors, many of the inequities the Ottawa Charter sought to address remain with us today.

Across Canada, where a person lives, works, learns and ages continues to shape their health in significant ways. People living in poverty experience poorer health outcomes than those with higher incomes. Indigenous communities continue to face unacceptable disparities in health and access to health care while Black Canadians continue to encounter barriers within health-care systems and experience disproportionate burdens of chronic disease. These patterns are well documented and widely recognized, yet they remain deeply entrenched.

During my public health training, I often encountered the same conclusion across different courses, disciplines and research studies: health is shaped by far more than health care. The evidence supporting this is extensive, yet our policy responses often remain fragmented, with health, housing, education, employment and social services operating in separate silos despite their profound interconnectedness.

There is also a tendency to treat investments in the social determinants of health as secondary to other priorities. Affordable housing, income supports, early childhood development, food security and community infrastructure are often discussed as social policy issues, while health is discussed separately, even though these investments are themselves health interventions. The Ottawa Charter challenged that way of thinking four decades ago, recognizing that the conditions that allow people to live healthy lives are fundamental to improving population health.

Accountability presents another challenge. Governments regularly commit to reducing health inequities, yet translating those commitments into sustained action remains difficult because advancing the social determinants of health requires coordinated action across housing, education, labour, transportation, immigration and the environment. When responsibility is shared across so many sectors, accountability can become diffuse, and we still lack robust mechanisms to hold decision-makers across government accountable for making measurable progress on the social conditions that shape health.

The Charter emphasized community participation and empowerment. Yet many of the communities most affected by inequities continue to be consulted only after priorities have already been established, rather than being meaningfully involved in shaping them from the outset. Communities possess knowledge, expertise and lived experience that are essential to effective policymaking, and sustainable progress depends not only on evidence but also on who is involved in translating that evidence into action.

The Charter’s anniversary arrives at a moment when Canada is grappling with housing affordability, rising food insecurity, growing concerns about mental health and persistent inequities experienced by Indigenous, Black and other marginalized communities. These issues are often discussed independently, yet they are deeply connected through the social and material conditions that shape health and wellbeing.

Perhaps the most important lesson from the Ottawa Charter is that evidence alone does not produce change. If it did, many of the inequities we see today would have been addressed long ago. Research can help us understand problems, identify solutions and inform decision-making, but meaningful progress ultimately depends on political will, sustained investment, cross-sector collaboration and a commitment to addressing the root causes of inequity.

Forty years after the Ottawa Charter, the gap between knowledge and action remains one of public health’s greatest challenges.  Whether the Charter’s vision becomes reality over the next 40 years will depend not on whether we continue to generate evidence, but on whether we finally find the collective resolve to act on what we already know.

Share on:
Related content
Jun 9, 2024
by Gary Bloch

Backlash against call for equity in medicine is misguided

A backlash against EDIA (equity, diversity, inclusion and accessibility) is gripping Canadian medicine. The reasons for this backlash are complex but ultimately misguided.

May 7, 2025

Closing the gap: The urgent need to support Ontario’s community health workers

Authors

Sylvia Okonofua

Contributor

Sylvia Okonofua is a public health professional, researcher and Founder and Executive Director of Black Donors Save Lives. Her work focuses on health equity, health policy and the social determinants of health, with particular interests in translating evidence into public policy and improving equitable access to health care. She regularly works with health organizations and community partners to advance health equity through research, education and advocacy.

Republish this article

Republish this article on your website under the creative commons licence.

Learn more

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Authors

Sylvia Okonofua

Contributor

Sylvia Okonofua is a public health professional, researcher and Founder and Executive Director of Black Donors Save Lives. Her work focuses on health equity, health policy and the social determinants of health, with particular interests in translating evidence into public policy and improving equitable access to health care. She regularly works with health organizations and community partners to advance health equity through research, education and advocacy.

Republish this article

Republish this article on your website under the creative commons licence.

Learn more

Donate to Healthy Debate

Your support allows us to publish journalism about healthcare in Canada that is free to read and free to republish. Donations are tax-deductible.

Donate

Join the mailing list

Sign up below to receive our newsletter every Thursday morning.

You can republish our articles online or in print for free. Read more.

Republish us
  • About
  • Contribute
  • Contact
  • Community Guidelines
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Republish this article

  1. Please use the invisible republishing code below on the page where you republish this article.
  2. Please give credit to Healthy Debate and include a link back to our home page or the article URL . Our preference is a credit at the top of the article and that you include our logo  (available by clicking the link below).

Please read the full set of instructions for republication here.