Healthy Debate
  • Search
  • Health topics
  • Debates
  • Special Series
  • All topics
  • All articles
Most popular today
  • COVID-19 (568)
  • Vaccines (143)
  • Opioids (55)
  • Cancer (169)
  • Addiction (179)
  • Racism (41)
  • Alcohol (23)
  • Infectious Disease (688)
  • Marijuana (23)
  • Tobacco (24)
  • Aging (218)
  • Dementia (47)
  • Long-Term Care (86)
  • Children and Youth (286)
  • Education (409)
  • Medical Education (208)
  • Depression (28)
  • Misinformation (115)
  • Nursing (31)
  • End of Life (188)
  • In Memoriam (5)
  • MAiD (34)
  • Environment (74)
  • Climate Change (39)
  • About
  • Subscribe
Opinion
Nov 11, 2025
by Emily Foucault Jess Taylor-Calhoun

The words we use: Why inclusive language in health care is about safety

2 Comments
Share on:

Discharge notes, public health posters and so-called patient-friendly pamphlets often are the first points of contact between people and the health-care system. Too often, however, these materials rely on language that excludes more than informs – cold, clinical or carelessly stigmatizing words that can make a person feel more like a diagnosis than a human being.

Canada is home to hundreds of languages, and nearly half of Canadians struggle with health literacy. Medical speak can be exclusionary, with too much jargon.

The simple truth is, if your message can’t be understood, it can’t build trust.

That tension motivated us through the development of the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health’s (CAMH) new Clear and Inclusive Writing Guidelines, out next year. Together, we worked with more than 50 contributors across CAMH, from patients and caregivers to clinicians and community members, to inform how Canada’s largest mental health hospital communicates. This model reflected how inclusive communication doesn’t belong to one department – it belongs to all of us.

We learned through this process that language isn’t just a communications tool, it’s a trust-building tool. And when health-care institutions get it wrong, the consequences aren’t just stylistic, they’re structural. They’re personal.

Every group we spoke to during the consultation phase clearly stated that people often soften their words to avoid offending others, even if it means minimizing their own pain or lived experience. Not out of confusion, but out of caution.

Our biggest takeaway was that rather than using the one-size-fits-all rule, it’s best to ask people the language they prefer, and then use that language. For instance, some people who are autistic prefer to call themselves an “Autistic person,” capital A included. For others, a “person who has autism” is preferred. While patterns in language emerge in communities, no one person can represent everyone from an identity group.

To use language inclusively, you need to listen to who you are describing. It’s not about political correctness. It’s about accuracy and dignity.

But the language in many settings is still deeply stigmatizing. We heard example after example of outdated or harmful terms still being used in health systems today. For instance, people with substance use concerns are still regularly referred to as “addicts,” or “drug users.” These labels reduce people to their most vulnerable moment.

Alongside many hospitals and organizations, CAMH has adopted one small shift that can make a big difference – moving away from labels. Instead of saying “an addict,” say “a person with a substance use disorder.” This is called person-first language.

Many of our collaborators have heard terms that worsen stigma about mental health. Individuals experiencing psychosis are often called “unstable” or “psychotic,” despite the fact that these terms carry a long history of harm and misunderstanding. People living with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia may be harmfully described as “manic,” “dangerous” or “off their meds.” Clinical terms like “non-compliant” are used to describe patients who may be self-advocating or navigating trauma-informed care in their own way. And from people diagnosed with personality disorders, we heard labels like “difficult” or “unreliable” can even affect access to treatment.

Sometimes these terms are used out of habit. Sometimes due to ignorance. Sometimes with malice. But the effect is always the same: patients feel reduced, misrepresented or shut out entirely. This isn’t just about word choice – it’s about power, perception, and whether people feel safe enough to show up honestly in their care.

That truth alone reveals how urgently we need to shift how we communicate in care settings. If we want people to show up fully, they need to know they’ll be met with understanding – not assumptions. Our language needs to reflect this openness and acceptance. This was the approach we took with CAMH’s Clear and Inclusive Writing Guidelines because changing the language we use is a meaningful way to change how people feel in a system.

When planning this project, we knew that we couldn’t talk about inclusive writing without reflecting the principles in our own work. An inclusive writing guide needs to be shaped by the people it’s meant to serve, and that meant building a process rooted in co-creation.

We moved beyond fixed titles or traditional hierarchies. Whether someone was a patient advisor, caregiver, researcher or clinician, every contributor’s voice carried equal weight. Instead of labelling someone strictly as a “patient” or a “clinician,” we honoured all expertise – lived, professional or both. Our team approached our collaborators’ experiences with an openness to learning the language of inclusion while helping others feel seen.

This collaboration had a positive effect beyond the creation of the guide. Our collaborators spoke of the effect on their healing journey, how exploring the most sensitive and accurate language to describe their experiences gave them power. Collaborators spoke openly about substance use, mental health and disability in a way that often felt difficult in other settings. This was due to an effort to find the right words, a willingness to listen and learn, and to work toward respectful language together, even when it didn’t come easily.

We will be presenting our process at the Where’s the Patient Voice in Health Professional Education conference in Vancouver Nov. 12-15. We hope CAMH’s Clear and Inclusive Writing Guidelines will help to spark broader conversations across the country – and serve as a model for what’s possible when patients are not just consulted, but co-creators.

Inclusive language is a living practice. Let’s treat it that way – with care, intention and the humility to keep learning.

CAMH’s Clear and Inclusive Writing Guidelines is a digital tool and PDF document. This resource recommends inclusive practices and style guidelines for CAMH staff writing health materials and communications across the hospital, ensuring language is respectful, accurate, clear and consistent. Coming in 2026 through CAMH Education.

Share on:
Related content
Sep 23, 2025
by Abigail Jaimes Zelaya

Black mistrust is logical and rational: What public health policymakers must learn from Black communities

Black communities are not hesitant just for the sake of it. They are hesitant because of memory. They need structural change built from trust, not just crisis.

Jun 23, 2025
by Stephanie Quon

Accessibility: The overlooked competency in medical school

The topic of disability is taught, albeit in a limited way, in our medical schools. Yet, one essential element remains glaringly underrepresented: accessibility.

Jul 17, 2024
by Maddi Dellplain

Telegraph hit job a prime example of how not to report on drug policy

The Telegraph story depicts Vancouver's Downtown Eastside in a way that maximizes the harm done to their most vulnerable sources. But as journalists, we don't need to punch down to do our jobs.

Authors

Emily Foucault

Contributor

Emily Foucault is a Toronto-based brand partner, content creator and patient advisor with a background in marketing and storytelling. Emily serves as a Patient Advisor with the University of Toronto’s Department of Family and Community Medicine (DFCM) and The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health .

You can follow her journey and insights on social media @emilyfoucault

Jess Taylor-Calhoun

Contributor

Jess Taylor-Calhoun is a Communications Coordinator (Editor) at Education, CAMH. Jess draws on her lived experience with neurodivergence, injury, queerness, and mental health to inform her perspectives on writing, editing, and inclusive language. She was co-author of the Health Equity and Inclusion Framework for Education and Training | CAMH, and is passionate about integrating the patient experience into mental health and substance use education and communication.

Republish this article

Republish this article on your website under the creative commons licence.

Learn more

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 Comments
  • Deborah Simpson says:
    November 13, 2025 at 1:52 pm

    I aprreciate your article very much! Because of a very difficult experience I had with Dental Anxiety, I now advocate for Trauma-Informed Dental Care on my new Instagram Account, and I do follow Healthy Debate on that platform too. I have often felt that if I tell Dentists or Health Care Providers how I’d like to be communicated with or cared for, that I would be treated like I was being a nuisance. Also, due to Adverse Childhood Experiences, I hadn’t been to the dentist very much in my life, and I didn’t know I would be so nervous as I started my extensive dental treatment, so it’s important that all Health Care providers know what the signs of Anxiety are and know how to respond in a way that doesn’t retraumatize the Patient. Thank you again for this article. Deborah

    Reply
    • Emily says:
      November 24, 2025 at 2:43 pm

      Thank you so much for sharing this, Deborah. Your advocacy for trauma-informed dental care is so important — dental anxiety is so often misunderstood, and patients shouldn’t feel like a “nuisance” for expressing what they need to feel safe. You’re absolutely right that providers need to recognize the signs of anxiety and respond in a way that prevents retraumatization. I’m really glad the article resonated, and I’m grateful for the work you’re doing.

      Reply
Authors

Emily Foucault

Contributor

Emily Foucault is a Toronto-based brand partner, content creator and patient advisor with a background in marketing and storytelling. Emily serves as a Patient Advisor with the University of Toronto’s Department of Family and Community Medicine (DFCM) and The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health .

You can follow her journey and insights on social media @emilyfoucault

Jess Taylor-Calhoun

Contributor

Jess Taylor-Calhoun is a Communications Coordinator (Editor) at Education, CAMH. Jess draws on her lived experience with neurodivergence, injury, queerness, and mental health to inform her perspectives on writing, editing, and inclusive language. She was co-author of the Health Equity and Inclusion Framework for Education and Training | CAMH, and is passionate about integrating the patient experience into mental health and substance use education and communication.

Republish this article

Republish this article on your website under the creative commons licence.

Learn more

Donate to Healthy Debate

Your support allows us to publish journalism about healthcare in Canada that is free to read and free to republish. Donations are tax-deductible.

Donate

Join the mailing list

Sign up below to receive our newsletter every Thursday morning.

You can republish our articles online or in print for free. Read more.

Republish us
  • About
  • Contribute
  • Contact
  • Community Guidelines
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Republish this article

  1. Please use the invisible republishing code below on the page where you republish this article.
  2. Please give credit to Healthy Debate and include a link back to our home page or the article URL . Our preference is a credit at the top of the article and that you include our logo  (available by clicking the link below).

Please read the full set of instructions for republication here.