Can family medicine meet the expectations of millennial doctors?


Leave a Comment

Enter the debate: reply to an existing comment
7 comments

  1. Anna Sylwestrowicz

    Teamwork, collaboration and making operating rooms more “human” is important as well. Surgeons still have an old school matcho attitude to their work and workaholism is praised.

  2. Dr. Dennis Kendel

    Above all, in every generation, we need to remember that our mission as family physicians is to optimize the health and meet the healthcare needs of people wherever they live. That includes people in rural communities, the economically deprived areas of our cities, and First nations communities. Inevitably, fulfilling that mission, often requires some modulation of personal ambitions and preferences.

  3. Gondi

    I disagree with the overarching “millennial” generalization.

    The fact is that the field doesn’t have to cater to “millennials”, it has to be a rewarding, satisfying professional career.

    At present, the reality of family medicine is one of an underfunded, undervalued, prestige-less, grinding job that will soon be replaced by nurses. The major attraction to family medicine is that its a short residency and affords the opportunity for part-time piecemeal work afterwards. Perfect for new mothers and fathers who want part-time work and aren’t “all-in” with medicine. For those that are more dedicated to medicine, the specialties provide a better professional avenue.

  4. Ashley

    Very interesting and informative blog.

    According to me, young doctors should practice under the guidance of senior doctors. And, if all the doctors work together in a one team, then only things will work out for all the communities.

    Regards
    Ashley
    http://www.southlandmedical.com.au/

  5. JM

    Gondi, Your response, I believe, misses the point. All things change. In this case, the needs of those new folks coming into the profession have changed…based, in part, on a variety of factors/reasons. Your response would appear to be underpinned by an old-school line of thinking based on your personal biography and not on the evidence which, to date, has clearly pointed to a need for change. Gone are days of “this is the way I was trained and this is the way I and all should practice”…a foolish response and one that lacks any kind of empathy–an ability core to what the public and profession would argue is vital.

  6. TapOut

    As the popularity and effectiveness metrics (not individual or accounting KPI) improve the evidence in favour of better *patient care* , skill retention and accountability and provinces **proactively plan migration** from single practise to team based funding models solutions should emerge and evolve. Such a phenomenon means good fiscal succession planning and collaboration about stable health care funding across the country along with a general understanding that at the federal level we need a modern (21st century ) health care act before 2025, a quarter of the century into the century, with functional single payer funding model commitments. A Strong dose of political will and lower lobbist influence from within Canada and from that behemoth health care “industry” to our South is needed.

Submit a comment