Can Endgame Tobacco radically reduce cigarette smoking? - Healthy Debate
Article

Can Endgame Tobacco radically reduce cigarette smoking?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

5 Comments
  • sam plover says:

    I find it amazing that alcohol ‘abuse’ receives detox time in hospitals, yet smokers are supposed to go to a support group once per week, take a drug with dangerous effects and call it quits.
    Not long ago, doctors also smoked. The really horrible part of this government induced mess is that people got killed with licence and are often maligned by ER staff, by doctors and nurses who are vindictive and feel that choking to death serves a smoker right.
    A nurse I know witnessed a doctor of a COPD patient saying to his patient, “well, this is what you get, how does it feel to have that vent”……
    There is a point when blame should be anywhere else except the victim. Alcohol and other substances are addictive.
    Then we should also limit alcohol. But no, because the ‘reasonable’ consumer needs his two shots a night, but does not consider it an addiction. “I drink to relax and unwind”. “i know when to stop”

  • Bill Godshall says:

    If tobacco end gamers truly wanted to sharply reduce cigarette smoking, they:
    – would truthfully inform Canadians that smokeless tobacco and vapor products are far less harmful than cigarettes,
    – would truthfully inform Canadians that millions of smokers have quit smoking by switching to vaping or smokeless tobacco,
    – would encourage all Canadian smokers to switch to vaping or to using smokeless tobacco,
    – wouldn’t have lobbied Health Canada to ban the sale of lifesaving nicotine vapor products in 2009,
    – wouldn’t have lobbied to ban tobacco advertisements and retailer displays for smokeless tobacco,
    – wouldn’t have lobbied to ban smokefree vaping in workplaces,
    – wouldn’t have lobbied to ban the sale of flavored smokeless tobacco products,
    – wouldn’t be lobbying for S-5 provision to severely restrict/ban vapor advertising and truthful claims.

    Also, the term End Game is code word for Prohibition. But since tobacco/nicotine prohibitionists have lobbied to deny smokers legal access to and truthful information about low risk smokefree alternatives, don’t expect them to admit the End Game is synonymous with Prohibition.

  • Joel L. Nitzkin, MD says:

    I think we need to consider what our “end game” hopes to end. In Western society, almost all the deaths and most of the addiction is to cigarettes. Combustible cigarettes are, by far, the the most hazardous and most addictive of tobacco-related products. Deaths from all other tobacco-related products, combined, are so low that, at least in the United States, they are not estimated on a regular basis and not tracked by any federal agency.
    If our goal is to end tobacco-related addiction, illness and death, as we now know it, much is to be said to change our goal from a “tobacco” end game to a “smoking” or “cigarette” end game. Most of this can probably be done by simply informing current and potential future smokers of the differences in risk posed by e-cigarettes and smokeless tobacco options, and enabling and empowering consumers to switch to these both far less hazardous and less addictive products. The evidence to date clearly shows that the risk of potentially fatal tobacco-related illness posed by smokeless tobacco is close to zero, and the same can be said for nicotine, as an isolated substance. The idea that the smokeless tobacco products widely available on the north American and European markets cause mouth and throat cancer is a myth. Evidence gathered to date, largely dismissed by tobacco control authorities also shows e-cigs to be a gateway AWAY from cigarettes for both smoking and non-smoking teens who may be prone to experiment with such products.

    Such an approach would mean adding a tobacco harm reduction component to current tobacco control programming and redefining (at least in the USA, for regulatory purposes) smoking as a behavior as opposed to a disease. Once that is done, we could harness the power of the marketplace, at little or no cost to the public sector to maintain and accelerate current enhanced trends for reduction in smoking prevalence by both teens and adults, and so in a non-coercive manner.

    I know that what I am saying conflicts with the deeply held beliefs of those reading this proposal and comments. If any of you are, in fact, interested in learning more about the potential for tobacco harm reduction and e-cigarette related products securing public health benefits not likely readily achievable by other means, please write me and I will supply some key references. Joel L. Nitzkin, MD jlnitzkin@gmail.com

  • Frederick Weston says:

    Greetings: Fiore et al “Methods to Quit Smoking”-JAMA/1990 reported; 20% at 12 months and 42% of smokers at 5 years will end their habit/addiction; if they are equipped with behavior change training that empowers and enables them to ‘unlearn’ their psychological, habitual and emotional dependencies. The “choice is yours” introductory seminar has ‘engaged’ virtually every smoker (98%) at 4,000 work sites in the above mentioned training. As you are aware, smokers’ ‘engagement’ in fully-funded traditional cessation programs at the workplace has been +/- 3% since 1997. Why 100,000+ smokers ‘chose’ the AMS Training is easy to explain. I would be pleased to do so.

  • Gerald Evans says:

    A worthy goal. Having said that, somewhat ironic when over this same time we, as a society, are about to drive up rates of cannabis consumption with legalizing the latter’s recreational use. Good evidence that carcinogenic compounds are by-products of marijuana smoke not just tobacco.

Authors

Karen Palmer

Contributor

Karen is the Destination Development and Marketing Coordinator at The Corporation of the County of Prince Edward.

Sachin Pendharkar

Contributor

Sachin Pendharkar is a respiratory and sleep doctor and an Assistant Professor of Medicine and Community Health Sciences at the University of Calgary.

Francine Buchanan

Contributor

Francine Buchanan is a mom and primary caregiver to an amazing little boy who is thriving with complex medical needs. When she isn’t watching or playing baseball with her family, she is a Ph.D. student at the University of Toronto studying physician/patient communication.

Republish this article

Republish this article on your website under the creative commons licence.

Learn more