How public funding has changed IVF in Ontario

The comments section is closed.

  • Crystal Young says:

    Hi I’m interested in doing the IVF treatment, VERY interested as my fiancé and I have been trying for a few years now to have a baby, and trust me we have tried all kinds of things and just about if not all we can do to try and get pregnant, well as much as we could afford that is and still a few yes later we have not had any luck. The more times we try and try new and different things to get pregnant and wat we can afford just to have it turn around and not get pregnant and that nothing worked it’s is affecting both of us but I think it’s definently effecting me a whole lot more. We try and try and try and when we do the pregnant tests to find out if I’m pregnant and it says we are Not I’ll be honest I’ve been getting so upset and so stressed and so depressed I’m starting to think the worst and that is I’ll never be able to get pregnant and I definently cannot afford to do the IVF treatments, it’s just that they are SO very expensive and I or should I say we cannot afford to pay for these IVF treatments. Then I was talking to a friend who said that it was covered on our OHIP health cards, I didn’t think nor did it sound right so I began to look it up online and I’ve read so many different things and some things I have read says that it is covered on our OHIP health cards and so on. I came across your article and stuff and read it all. And well I’m here to ask and hope that you guys are in fact one place that this is accepted at and if so what do I do, how do I go about doing this and what’s needed and these kinds of questions. I hope to hear back from you soon and I pray to god that you can help me and my fiancé.

    Thank You

  • Corine Harris says:

    This article is brimming with information about severing corollary relief, hanging tight for more like this. I have additionally discovered an article anybody can check for more data to If You Need a Divorce Now: Know about Severing Corollary Relief . It was knowingly more instructive. You may discover more insights regarding it here.

  • Triana Burford says:

    The medication should be funded too. I have had to create a GoFundMe account just to pay for the medication as my benefits through work do NOT cover any of them. It’s truly sad the we have to go through so much to have a baby.
    I anyone see’s this and would like to donate please visit the link below. Infertility sucks and now one should have to suffer through it because they can’t afford the cost cost of medication which is $7+

  • Martins says:

    I recommend ( Robinsonbuckler @ ) yahoo com.. to everyone wanting herpes cure . a wonderful doctor and very very professional.

  • Brittany says:

    The medications should be covered along with it, I’m 30 years old I have no children. I’ve been struggling with infertility for years and have pretty much given up before I’ve even started treatment due to just the sheer cost of the medications per cycle. It’s sad that those who aren’t wealthy enough pretty much have no option. Just because we can’t affford it doesn’t mean we don’t deserve to have children of our own.

  • Sawsan Refaat says:

    Does an ODSP approved can transplant a uterus is it covered?

  • Tanya says:

    My husband and I did IVF in 2014, right before the funding was available. We could have waited another year if we had known..We spent close to 30 000$ and it never worked…why was there no public knowledge this was coming????

  • Sanne Peters says:

    Contact this love doctor in relationship or marriage problem and infertility problem and herpes cure too, all kinds of problem you find difficult to resolve and he will put a lasting solution to it. Here his email _________________________________^_^ Thank you! robinsonbucler @gmail (.) com

  • Rhodelia says:

    I just want to clarify this statement:

    “A cycle is defined as starting with ovarian stimulation and ending with the transfer of all embryos resulting from fertilization until either a pregnancy results or the embryos run out.”

    Does it mean that even though I failed on the first embryo transfer, I can still do the second embryo transfer for free as long as I still have the frozen embryos?

  • Shawn Johnson East says:

    Married in 2016, I am 27 years old. i am so happy to be a mother of my first baby girl weighed 8 pounds, 8 ounces and was 20.5 inches long when she was born on Oct. 29, i have been trying to conceive for over 2 years now, after i suffered a miscarriage. But after holding our sweet girl in my arms and being told everything went well and she had made it to us safely I could have cared less. My/our world no longer has anything to do with us but everything to do with her. It’s all for her, one day i was just on the internet searching for how i can get pregnant fast. i came across some testimonial giving by some women and it was all about Dr micheal casper then i said to myself let me give it a try and know if it will work for me, after using his recommended natural pregnancy herbs and medication am so proud to be a mother, thank you so much Doctor for making me a happy mother. I will forever do anything for this girl that I love more than I ever could imagine. A love no one can ever prepare you for, if you know you are having the same problem i had before conceiving

  • Dr.Arpitha Reddy says:

    The blog has great information thanks for the blog, keep posting blog like this
    we also publish blogs related IVF treatment and gives services of IVF Treatment

  • Omolola Esan says:

    I want to have IVF. I’m a single mom of 10yrs old boy living in Quebec.

    • Anna says:

      I’m am from Quebec too and I got 2 IVF completely free with all the drugs and test (sperm, follicles ultrasounds etc.) at 0$, all covered by the provincial health card plus back then there was no age cap and everybody had the right to 3 sessions. But all that was prior to the Nov. 2015 legislation that changed everything. The 2015 new legislation gave only a tax credit of 10 000$ maximum up 80% for those of 50 000$ max yearly income and only 20% for 120 000$ income and only to those who don’t have children, never went through a vasectomy and it caped the age at 43. It was still doable for many since IVF treatment in Quebec only range between 6000$ to 12 000$ (You can check all treatment prices on OVO CLINIC website for your case, that’s the clinic I had both IVF’s). This spring or summer 2020 another program will be reinstalled that may allow up to 2 Invitro session completely free. Good luck

  • Defeated says:

    IVF should be funded for 1 pregnancy. I went through 1 cycle of meds, followed all the protocols, everything was going great until the egg retrieval procedure where NO eggs were retrieved out of more than 30 follicles. There was no explanation as to why and my clinic was shocked. Now my cycle is used up and I didn’t even get a chance to do a transfer. It’s been 6 years of trying and all of our med coverage is now gone.

  • Sumaira says:

    My funded ivf gave me 3 embryos but I didn’t get pregnant. Can I do fertility preservation in my round which is covered by Ohio?

    • Bluebird says:

      You can only do one round no matter what you choose. Preservation is never covered unless you’re a cancer patient.

  • Rayna says:

    What this article fails to mention is that Ontario ONLY funds a SINGLE cycle and the embryos which MAY come from that cycle.

    If you’re like me and many women I know, you could end up with absolutely nothing. IVF is a tough process and even the doctors can’t always predict how our bodies will respond.

    Statistically, it can take multiple cycles to be successful.

    It would be great multiple cycles could be funded with the loominf reality of a failed cycle. Instead, if it fails, you have to pay out of pocket and potentially rely on multiple transfers upping the risk of twins.

    • Katrina says:

      Yes I think government should fund one child per couple so if first IVF doesn’t succeed they can continue until they do. I also had a failed funded IVF wish they would fund the medications or at least 50%.

      • Lolo says:

        the Ontario gov doesn’t even fund meds for transplant patients which they need to survive, they aren’t going to fund medications that assist a treatment. Having one funded round is much more than other countries have, even more than other provinces! One funded round without medications is better than no funded rounds at all. And most benefit companies cover the medications (or a portion of the medications) used for IVF.

      • Louise says:

        Actually very few companies cover fertility meds and many that do cover a very small portion. My benefits cover a lifetime 2500 in fertility meds. My IVF cycle cost me over 6000 in meds.. then the thousands more I have spent in meds for transfers. A funded cycle of IVF is amazing but still cost most people thousands of dollars on meds and extras like genetic testing ect. I know very few women who have had IVF and had their meds covered by insurance.

      • Hopeless says:

        I’m a 36 year old woman ( soon to be 37) my husband and I have been trying to conceive for 7.5 years now. I was still young and in my late 20’s when we started trying. I’ve had 6 misscarriages, 2 emergency surgeries, 3 emergency D&C’s, 2 ectopic pregnancies, 3 failed IUI’s. My last pregnancy ended in a miscarriage at 12 weeks pregnant putting me in ICU and almost dying. I had multiple blood transfusions and emergency surgery. We desperately want a child. But it’s been quite a scary journey for me and my husband. We’ve done all the test, meds, treatment, ect… but all unsuccessful. All our tests come back normal. I’m a medical mystery at this point. This IVF funding has given us a sliver of hope.I have a fairly good job, good benefits but they don’t cover any thing fertility related. I’m glad this IVF funding is finally available to us after all these years but I feel it should be triaged. They should look at everyone’s personal story to determine who needs and should get it first. Who’s a priority. Questions such as age, # of misscarriages, years trying, medical history etc… to determine where they stand in the wait list. I’ve been told now I’m on a 2 year waiting list which means I’ll be almost 40 by the time I get my chance at IVF funding. The cut off age for this funding is 43. So although I’m very happy that the government of Ontario has finally brought back IVF funding I feel that more thought and planning should have been put into this. Hopefully they can get things figured out so that in the future it will be a more promising option and less stressful process for those who are yearning to have a child.

      • Sumaira says:

        Yes Katrina that’s my question is. Now can we do fertility preservation covered by Ohip?

      • Louise says:

        Yes some fertility preservation is covered by OHIP.

  • doug hepburn says:

    Stop funding IVF for people who decided to have vasectomy or tubal ligation

    • Justice MacDonnell says:

      Unfortunately things happen in life I had a tubal done after my last baby at 25 years old and she passed away at 4 months old did I no she was going to pass way no I regret it so bad I miss my daughter so much and this is my only hope to keep going

    • Nicola Couchman says:

      I did a tubal due to domestic violence so keep your comments to yourself. I found someone worth having children for now, why can I be funded for a IVF Doug tell me?

  • Adam Smith says:

    This is a ridiculous government program. It benefits middle and upper middle class rich people paid for by taxes received from all people.

    I understand the emotional draw: who could possibly oppose children? I get it. My sister and her husband paid for IVF and we have a wonderful child in our family as a result. But our family is wealthy enough to afford it. Why should poorer taxpayers pay for that?

    It is also an excellent example of private medicine: all IVF services were delisted under OHIP so we now have a partial/limited government subsidy with private pay for the rest.

    Doctors of course are making tons of money off this.

    • Shawn says:

      Adam, I find your expression of concern for the poor one of moral contradiction.
      If I understand you correctly, IVF should go back to being privately funded so as to lessen the financial burden on the poor that comes with paying (additional?) taxes for this funded program. Doing this would benefit the poor.
      However, if IVF goes back to being privately funded then these same poor people who are also infertile will not be able to have children because they cannot afford the high costs of private IVF. Doing this would harm the poor. Pre-public funding, many Ontarians went childless who could not afford the high cost of IVF.
      There are many alternatives to scrapping the program that also address your concern about inequitable tax burden. One would be to introduce means testing to determine eligibility. Another is to use the existing eligibility criteria but introduce a means test to fund individuals on a sliding scale based on income. Of course, all these options add cost and complexity which, if paid for out of the program’s fixed budget, would reduce the number of Ontarians who can participate in the program.
      The program is not perfect. Far from it. But remember, its goal is to increase access to IVF services for infertile Ontarians. Two years in, more Ontarians who could not have afforded to it otherwise accessed IVF and successfully became parents. If as you say, ‘who could possibly oppose children?’ then on balance the program has provided more benefit than harm.

      • Adam Smith says:

        So you propose a program to means test a medical system to enable poor people to have children with public funds. but then those children are born into poverty that our society kicks to the curb (our child poverty rates in this province are reprehensible)?

        I am pointing out the inherent foolishness of this program. This program does not create access. It subsidizes access by mostly wealthier people paid for by mostly less wealthy people, it gives false hope to parents who would not otherwise pay for it, and enables participating physicians to make lots of money off the hopes and dreams of potential parents. All in the name of children.

        This is private medicine at its most morally bankrupt and subsidized in part by everyone else.

      • Peep says:

        There is a distinction that needs to be made between “poverty” and a person who cannot afford 10-35k on a medical procedure. There are many middle class families that are denied funding because they earn “too much” for the rebates and extras the poor receive, yet do not make enough money to afford the extravagance of a 100k/year salary. It has nothing to do with artificially allowing “poor” to conceive children that will be “born into poverty”.
        With all due respect, wise up that there is a whole economy of people who fall between the poverty line and your overbloated entitlement.


Dafna Izenberg


Dafna is the Managing editor of special projects at Maclean’s Magazine.

Francine Buchanan


Francine Buchanan is a mom and primary caregiver to an amazing little boy who is thriving with complex medical needs. When she isn’t watching or playing baseball with her family, she is a Ph.D. student at the University of Toronto studying physician/patient communication.

Ngozi Iroanyah


Ngozi Iroanyah is a fourth year PhD student at York University in Health Policy and Equity studies. She is also the caregiver of a lovely father who is experiencing the Dementia Journey.

Republish this article

Republish this article on your website under the creative commons licence.

Learn more